Chronologically, there is nothing "new" about Demise, therefore he can't be considered an appropriate replacement for Ganondorf in SSB4 should he replace him.
chronologically , demise is the newest boss .
i really can't tell if you are confused by this or if you are just playing dumb like dj .
Unlike Bowser, Ganondorf is actually killed time and time again, and resurrected time and time again. The creation of Demise helps the developers create new baddies instead of being constrained to one iconic Gerudo thief.
i have killed bowser many times . i have killed mario and luigi even more ; yet , they keep coming back . are the the same people ? are they copies ? nobody gives a shit . everyone with their head somewhere in the exterior of their asshole knows that it's a game .
i'm very good at chess because when i start to lose , i can just use my monopoly money to bribe the king , and if that doesn't work , i will ensnare him in a colorful , elaborate mouse trap , leaving clues and weapons here and there to obscure the mystery .
characters from one game don't interact with characters in another game .
if two games are designed with proper consideration , they can form a storyline in which the characters can be reconciled , but the games themselves do not interact .
you are trying your damnedest to make sense out of something that never will , injecting the facts with your own opinions , which contradict the established facts . moreover , the facts themselves are contradictory because at some point , nintendo decided that no sane person would try to piece together the mystery of a bunch of shit that was thrown together because there is no mystery . it's just a bunch of shit thrown together to sell games .
B. It does. Before Skyward Sword, it was Minish Cap that explained the origins of the garb. Things are always retconned.
oh , minish cap is supposed to explain how link got his cap ? then why does he already have it in skyward sword ? your timeline is wrong and therefore invalidates your entire argument . why is it that every time you try to put together a timeline , it's wrong ?
IT'S BECAUSE THERE IS NO TIMELINE
just look at the picture . does that look like a line to you ? no . a line doesn't branch every which way in order to make things unnecessarily complicated . when you play OT (english lesson: a preposition is not included in an acronym) , you travel back in forth in time probably at least 10 times . that makes 2^10 branches in time . moreover , you are trying to apply the principle of causality (a physical phenomenon) to a make believe world . it just doesn't make any sense and never will .
oh , nintendo issued a statement about the complete and true timeline of the legend of zelda universe ? how can this be ?
OH YEAH , IT'S BECAUSE THEY WANT YOUR MONEY .
C. I was talking in the context of Skyward Sword. Based on the Timeline, I could outline how the Triforce moved. You're right, it did change owners through time. In parts, it didn't have any owner. I was contesting Juan's claim that Ganondorf is a main character because he is a Triforce bearer. In SS, there was no Ganondorf, Demise didn't obtain the Triforce, Link obtained all three pieces. After the wish, it went back to the Sacred Realm. I talk in changing contexts, deal with it.
none of that matters .
in the original legend of zelda , there was only one triforce , and it just so happens that it was divided into 8 parts , 8 not being a multiple of 3 , so there's no way to fit that into the triforce trinity paradigm . they just made that up later . if you count the 2nd playthrough , there are only 2 triforces , a total of 16 pieces , also not divisible by 3 .
D. I don't doubt Ganondorf is freaking popular. But I agree with Rocky, the producers can do whatever they so please. If Demise was their way to stop using Ganondorf to cut corners on a timeline, then so be it.
that is very much not in agreement with me . in my opinion , if the producers do whatever they please without consideration for the integrity of the game or its heritage , they should be fired .
E. I'm speculating. I'm not passing anything except references as fact. Please get that in your head. If you don't like my opinion, you don't need to tell me that I'm passing it as fact, because it isn't. Demise means death. It's a double-edged sword for me. He brings death, and he always dies.
logic doesn't make any difference when the premise you speculate is untrue .
here is an example :
every potato has been elected president of the united states
only a natural born resident of the US can be president
if every potato was born in the US then there could be no potatos in ireland prior to trans-oceanic travel
every irish person has eaten at least one potato or died of famine
therefore conan obrien is an alien .
F. Where did I say it made sense? I just said it somewhat fits Demise. But as a fan, I do want to at least give him some originality like sword moves.
already ssbb gave ganondorf a sword to fight with . it is programmed in there and you can cause him to retain his sword as a weapon after taunting with it . they chose not to default this option because captain falcon doesn't have a sword , and in the year or so after the game was completed but before it hit stores , the development team couldn't be bothered to do any more work on a product that was already going to sell .
on a somewhat different note , someone please correct me if i'm wrong but i believe ganon appeared in more games than did ganondorf .
