I'm making this thread so that we can ask Rocky to merge all threads that have the same topic AND inform everyone which threads are repeating threads. Hopefully, if you find a repeat thread, put it here. #1 is always the original thread.
Here's a few of them now:
Famitsu gives a 40/40 to Brawl
1. Gen. Discussion: The review from Famitsu -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,854.0.html2. Gen. Discussion: Perfect Score -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,867.0.html3. Updates: Famitsu gives Brawl a perfect score -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,864.0.htmlThis is proof that even via the title, you'd know if a thread was made. Just check your unread topics first.
Here are some more:
The Updated Special Moves
1. Gen. Discussion: 1/16 Special Moves (formally known as Special Move Recap) -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,779.0.html2. Updates: 1/16 Special Move Lists -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,861.0.html3. Predictions: End of Day and C4 -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,870.0.htmlSee...it's pretty obvious that those threads are similar.
Patrick and Sakurai
1. Introductions: hi -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,832.0.html2. Gen. Discussion: Patrick and Sakurai? -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,860.0.html3. Gen. Discussion: patrick i need to kno -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,873.0.htmlHmm...maybe a stretch but you guys could have talked about that in his intro thread. Just a suggestion.
And of course the 4th one I've seen today is:
The Famous Roster Leak
1. Characters: Roster Rumor -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,659.0.html2. Predictions: Weird Coincidence -
http://www.smashpower.com/forums/index.php/topic,875.0.htmlNow this was just a total blindsight. I actually am OK with this simple mistake.
As for the rest of the threads, I don't know why it's happening to active threads. So please guys, read before posting. THANKS!

EDIT: And note, this thread is for posting double threads...the original double thread thread talked about merging threads of the same topic. So this serves a different purpose.