With the cloud theory, I already made so many ways to view the clouds. It's in the thread about it. What I don't understand is why others can see the SAME thing while others just couldn't. I guess it needs a trained eye with shading and bas relief. HAHA. I'm just more used to distinguishing shapes and stuff I guess. But don't underestimate it because it's really there. You can't really diss a theory when lots of people could see the same thing. I think it's what philosophers call the inter-intrasubjectivity tests. For me, I say it's real because others saw it and I saw it myself. But please reconsider it, it's not that obvious but you'll spot it. Shapewise...it's really accurate...will build on that using the pictures I posted on the thread and do some bas relief on it to try to copy the clouds and show the process here as well. Damn, that's a long post!
I disagree. Most people saw those objects because they were told to look for them. I for example, never saw Bowser in the clouds until somebody said he was in there. I immediately looked again and saw "Oh, I guess that looks like Bowser"
The odds of them hiding some hidden roster in such a way is pretty low, and other than the bowser cloud, I rank the others as pretty far stretched (most notably the "there's a generic looking pig here, so that meand Pigma or Wizpig will be in it, dispite the fact that it looks nothing like either of them")
